 | | Re: Now that I've had a chance to see the new colors
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mark Tarrabain wrote: <snip> (...) Recently this discussion between Douglas R. Clark and Mark Tarrabain brought up some issues about trust and corporate motivation. It was taken to .debate, but I would like to return it (...) (21 years ago, 19-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Yaay...
|
|
(...) Presumably Wesley has seen evidence of this act of "belligerency"? If so, why not put Padilla on trial! Scott A (...) (21 years ago, 19-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Justice for all.....
|
|
(...) Try: (URL) :) (...) The international criminal court; Bush refuses to sign up to it as your countrymen *could* end up in jail *if* they commit war crimes. Frankly, I feel war criminals belong in jail! Scott A (21 years ago, 19-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Democracy.... Dubya Style
|
|
(...) Easy: Prove me wrong. Scott A (21 years ago, 19-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Democracy.... Dubya Style
|
|
(...) How could one sleep with your incessant SOS rants? JOHN (21 years ago, 19-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Now that I've had a chance to see the new colors
|
|
(...) If I remember correctly, you asked “What *POSSIBLE* reason would TLC lie?”. Well I gave you some possible reasons. You did not ask for probable, plausible or credible reasons. I answered your question fairly, and you attack me instead? Heck, I (...) (21 years ago, 19-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Democracy.... Dubya Style
|
|
(...) That's right. I mean, how do you work with the ones that change their colors based on the whims of some focus group. (...) Yeah what I really want to talk about (the way to handle new colors in LDRAW) has gone underground with the LSC. I'm (...) (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Yaay...
|
|
(...) I wonder, though, what will prevent Dubya in his Imperial zeal, from simply throwing the matter to a non-public military tribunal? He certainly has no qualms about secrecy in these matters. (...) What the heck qualifies as belligerency? Does (...) (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Yaay...
|
|
Let's see if it sticks, and if Rummy can follow directions, but this is a bit of good news: From: (URL) Bush (news - web sites) does not have power to detain American citizen Jose Padilla, the former gang member seized on U.S. soil, as an enemy (...) (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Justice for all.....
|
|
(...) Scott never does that. :-) Neither do any of the rest of us here. ;-) (...) Rule #1 if you see a big nesting, deeper than 3 or 4, and it's you and Scott(1), and you're not getting anywhere with your point, give up. (...) International Criminal (...) (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
