 | | Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
|
|
They could have and if they got lucky it might have detonated over a Missile Silo(1). But there is now way that had we gone to war they would have caused us a whole lot of damage. There technology wasn't up to it. Not to mention they couldn't get (...) (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
|
|
(...) So are you the person that suggests the the USSR (rememeber that's what it was during the Cold War, or the CCCP if you prefer) couldn't have succeeded in launching an ICBM at us? (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
|
|
(...) But you probably should start your subject with "WARNING EVIL CLONES!!!" every time. (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
|
|
(...) probably lugnet.build is the most appropriate usually -- depending on if you're talking about properties of the bricks or about the companies themselves, you might want lugnet.build or lugnet.general... --Todd (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
|
|
Perhaps a Princess.... wrote in message <3621e044.4881529@20...63.236>... (...) I'm telling you, I will convince everyone that the Russians could never have hurt us at any time during the Cold War even had they tried too.;-> There is no such thing (...) (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
|
|
(...) I would say that lego-clone discussions are just as appropriate in the lego.* groups as they are on rec.toys.lego Certainly, I enjoy reading about them. Even if I am not sure I'd buy any. .debate is more for topics that lead to two highly (...) (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
|
|
Todd, if we want to discuss something other than Lego - the brand - do we have to do it in this section? I hope not. David Zorn (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Special Boxes
|
|
richard.dee@nospam.virgin.net wrote in message ... (...) Hehe, well it should be intresting to see what the US does, I'm willing to bet a minifig that they don't do anything, and that Bin Luadens nuke never appears, Probably he'll try to modify and (...) (26 years ago, 6-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Special Boxes
|
|
Matt Marshall wrote in message ... (...) a (...) I don't know about **any** detonation...... If they are so decrepit as previously suggested, they may well detonate whilst still in their bunkers! (...) The Ukrainians have apparently sold some (...) (26 years ago, 6-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Special Boxes
|
|
Ron Kittle wrote in message <3611B90F.699DDCA5@s...rr.com>... (...) I'm telling you the Russkies(1) wouldn't have been able to launch enough missiles to garuntee a detonation in any US city, much less a detonation at all. And now I don't have to (...) (26 years ago, 6-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
