|
|
 | | Re: An armed society...
|
| (...) Or worse, if either side can win and lose at the same time (destroying and being destroyed). (...) Good point. Just imagine the present day US president were in office in 1962, and his Soviet counterpart were Yeltsin. Brrr... :-/ (...) In a (...) (24 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: An armed society...
|
| (...) It did have a real outcome. My point is that such an outcome would probably have happened anyway. The majority of the CW "hotspots", where the two ideologies reached the point of conflict, had pre-existing tensions; they would have resulted in (...) (24 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Vendettas (was Re: The Care and Feedng of Your Trademark (Was: Community Policing...)
|
| (...) I'd argue that this is an admin issue if it belongs anywhere on LUGNET(tm) at all. (which I doubt, at this point, that it does) It's a stretch to see how this fits the lugnet.people charter: lugnet.people– All about LEGO® people (enthusiasts, (...) (24 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: The Care and Feedng of Your Trademark (Was: Community Policing...)
|
| XFUT'ed to .off-topic.debate and .people at Rich Mazno's request. Only keeping it in market for this one post, for continuity so people using newsreaders know my reply is moving. :-) (...) Is my assessment of the above post correct or incorrect? It (...) (24 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: An armed society...
|
| (...) So the support we gave to tin-pot dictators around the world just because they were willing to fight local communists had no real outcome? (...) We shall have to disagree. "Cold" infers not battle took place - hundreds of thousands (millions) (...) (24 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
