|
|
 | | Re: An armed society...
|
| (...) [snip] (...) I think discounting the possibility of change is short-sighted. The world changes. Laws change. Governments change. People change. Maybe this hasn't changed in a long time, but the fact there's a significant opposition to it (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: An armed society...
|
| (...) I have posted about the Ashwander Doctrine before -- read it and connect the dots, pretty please. (URL) the record, I am not exactly a card-carrying NRA kinda guy...I barely care what they do. (...) No, taxation is Constitutional because of (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: An armed society...
|
| (...) Actually, you would be missing the "duty" part of my argument in this little debate. But whatever... To fully understand the historical context of this debate, it is my opinion that those on the side of gun-control should read William (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: An armed society...
|
| (...) Then it's odd that the NRA, the most vociferous and organized proponents of so-called gun rights, has never brought a case successfully before the Supreme Court, despite numerous opportunities to try. You are of course correct regarding the (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: An armed society...(what if?)
|
| (...) To do otherwise means you have to take on BY CHOICE the life forced upon Frodo and Sam Wise in LOTR -- to risk everything at each new moment striving for freedom. It's so much easier to build a series of temporary autonomous zones, and just (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
