|
|
 | | Re: An armed society...
|
| (...) using (...) Not very many. They would tend to get shot for trying. (...) Only criminals use guns as a threat when there is no need. That is why they are criminals. (...) All things being equal otherwise, in areas where it is eaiser to legally (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: An armed society...
|
| (...) Flawed Logic. You have assumed I stated something along the lines of "[Hitler was an Elected offical therefore elected officals are bad]" What I stated, or at least was trying to convey, was that Hitler was an elected offical therefore (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: An armed society...
|
| (...) You can ask a rhetorical question and you can ask someone a question but you cannot ask someone a rhetorical question for when you ask a rhetorical question you don't want and/or expect an answer, as in, "What's up with that?" You can ask a (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: An armed society...
|
| (...) Can I ask you a rhetorical question, while still staying with the Hitler subject? Hitler was a vegetarian. Does that prove anything about vegetarians? Fredrik (24 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: An armed society...
|
| (...) As Stalin so eloquently put it; "Those who cast the votes decide nothing, those who count the votes decide everything." Just remember Hittler was an elected offical. Also note that the United States Gun Control act of 1968 is virtually word (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
