|
 | | Re: Medical Marijuana
|
| Hmm. Your post is amazingly similar to junk mail I received today. Funny that. (...) I agree, I'm all for effective cannabis-based prescription drugs. But then many illegal drugs have a place in medicine. What is the big deal? (...) Paranoia. (...) (...) (24 years ago, 22-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |  | | Re: Medical Marijuana
|
| (...) professionals and executives were the group most (...) yeah well, us folks from the 60s are getting on in years. (24 years ago, 22-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |  | | Re: Medical Marijuana
|
| (...) Well, I wasn't (see my followup to His Royal Majesty the Frog Prince) but thanks for thinking of me just the same :-)... (...) I think most US pot is domestic "greenhouse" grown. Pot's too low value for the mass to smuggle. Cheech and Chong (...) (24 years ago, 22-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |  | | Re: Medical Marijuana
|
| "Lawrence Wilkes" <lawrence@thewilkesf...rve.co.uk> wrote in message news:Gn7M3B.64z@lugnet.com... (...) most (...) Sorry. Northern Alliance! (24 years ago, 22-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |  | | Re: Medical Marijuana
|
| "Lawrence Wilkes" <lawrence@thewilkesf...rve.co.uk> wrote in message news:Gn7L6H.412@lugnet.com... (...) And if you are looking for consipacy stories Larry, we could ponder on the fact that only earlier this year the government refused to do this - (...) (24 years ago, 22-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |