 | | Re: trolling? (Was all that OT God stuff)
|
|
(...) And that would be incorrect in my understanding of the word "troll." troll (trol) verb 1. To post a message in a newsgroup or other online conference in the hopes that somebody else will consider the original message so outrageous that it (...) (24 years ago, 15-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
 | | Re: trolling? (Was all that OT God stuff)
|
|
(...) Thanks for the tip. Haven't seen it work that way here, though. (24 years ago, 15-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
 | | Re: The Nam-shub of Enki (was Re: One of my issues with the god of the old testament)
|
|
(...) I read Stephenson's novel last year, and while I liked it, I don't think he ever gets any more interesting than his obvious sources: Sumerian mythology, and William Burroughs. And I guess I fault Stephenson, and many other Cyberpunk authors, (...) (24 years ago, 15-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
 | | Re: trolling? (Was all that OT God stuff)
|
|
(...) Well, the thing that's wrong with that is the fact that there's nothing *but* connotation there. Being a "bonehead" is sufficiently without good definition, whereas a "troll" post has a definition as well as a connotation. If Jeremy only used (...) (24 years ago, 15-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
 | | RE: trolling? (Was all that OT God stuff)
|
|
(...) I see your point, but if (hypothetically) I call someone a bonehead, there's nothing wrong with it either, except the connotation. If Jeremy was using "troll" to say "bravo to you for throwing down the rhetorical gauntlet and inviting (...) (24 years ago, 15-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|