|
|
 | | Re: Larry's behaviour
|
| (...) Ban one of us. Do the poll I suggested. I have my preference as to which, but would support a democratic outcome either way. I have my honor, too, so would abide without a need for administrative intervention to enforce it. And then, once that (...) (23 years ago, 23-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Larry's behaviour
|
| (...) That's not what I asked. I *KNOW* you think he should apoligaise. I *KNOW* why *YOU'RE* doing it. You're way too proud to bother giving it up. You're addicted to the idea that you'll win. But that's not what I asked. I asked why is it better (...) (23 years ago, 23-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Larry?
|
| (...) our civil law enforcement system, even if we are certain that they have violated the rights of thousands of innocent civilians, until they have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt to be guilty. These are merely suspects. If the (...) (23 years ago, 23-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Larry?
|
| I figure Larry will have something to say about this, but it's interesting reguardless: (URL) (23 years ago, 23-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: train track prservation
|
| (...) That's an issue with your reading comprehension, not the message. (...) When someone catches you in a lie, pointing it out is "bickering", apparently. That's another lie. This "bickering" characterisation is the same lie you used to try to (...) (23 years ago, 23-Oct-01, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
