 | | Re: Conspiracy theories: men on the moon
|
|
(...) why not? aren't they debatable? (23 years ago, 8-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Conspiracy theories: men on the moon
|
|
(...) Why ask about conspiracy theories? (23 years ago, 8-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Conspiracy theories: men on the moon
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> (...) Ummm...why what? (23 years ago, 8-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Lobster Bisque (was: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?)
|
|
(...) I think the mechanism being used so far (undercover employees reporting what they see) seems to be working fine for identifying problems. I am satisfied that this problem exists, just not as of yet clear on how endemic it is, nor clear that my (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Conspiracy theories: men on the moon
|
|
(...) Beyond a shadow? I dunno. A shadow of doubt doesn't take much to support it. Beyond a reasonable doubt though, yes. (...) I share a trait with Dave! (see, got his name to be last in the sentence) I too will get into debates with people for no (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
