To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *11437 (-5)
  Re: Lobster Bisque (was: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?)
 
(...) Blasphemy! Who will protect us from Xenu (not The Warrior Princess) if not L. Ron? Dave! (24 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Lobster Bisque (was: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?)
 
(...) It was quite clearly a sign from God that Scientology is in fact stupid. DaveE (24 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Lobster Bisque (was: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?)
 
(...) Interestingly (or maybe not--you tell me), something analogous happened to me a few years ago during a one-on-one meeting with a Scientology "Advocate" (or whatever their brainwashers are called). Eventually I got sick of the crazy rhetoric (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Lobster Bisque (was: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?)
 
Ok, I noticed something odd while mulling over the topic on my way home last night... While I admitted elsewhere that I agree to a certain degree of immorality for eating meat, but that it was negligible, I'm actually not sure that's the case-- at (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Validity testing (was: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?)
 
(...) Very disappointing. You guys never insulted each other either. :-) Try to do better next time Dave! (24 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR