|
|
 | | Re: Is this sexism?
|
| (...) Yeah-- their company has... issues. Their turnover rate is silly. Someone came into her department on their first day of work. The next day she called in to quit. Now *that's* turnover! Suffice to say my friend's looking for new work, and the (...) (24 years ago, 29-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Is this sexism?
|
| (...) Agreed. Night watchmen sort of have to watch at night, and Sunday School teachers sort of have to teach on Sundays. :-) (...) Truck factor 2!!! That company is asking for trouble. :-) She needs to ask for a big raise at the same time her co (...) (24 years ago, 29-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Is this sexism?
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes: <snip> (...) Well of course! IMHO, other than the common law prohibitions we've had all along there isn't much of *anything* that makes a good choice for government legislation. :-) But the usual (...) (24 years ago, 29-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Is this sexism?
|
| (...) Because certain jobs *do* require specific days to be worked, and are paid hourly. Mine isn't. If my company instigated that policy among my department (other departments like support, where you have to *be* there wouldn't be covered under (...) (24 years ago, 29-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Is this sexism?
|
| (...) I think that would be what I'd suggest. It's up to the company to decide whether or not to undertake such a policy. If they pull it off, great! But my personal guess is that any company that tries it is liable to get a mouthful of abuse with (...) (24 years ago, 29-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
