Subject:
|
Re: Is this sexism?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 29 Jun 2001 02:15:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
462 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
<snip>
> And as such, it
> likewise makes an even worse choice for government legislation.
Well of course!
IMHO, other than the common law prohibitions we've had all along there isn't
much of *anything* that makes a good choice for government legislation. :-)
But the usual suspects all knew I would point that out. :-)
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Is this sexism?
|
| (...) I think that would be what I'd suggest. It's up to the company to decide whether or not to undertake such a policy. If they pull it off, great! But my personal guess is that any company that tries it is liable to get a mouthful of abuse with (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
244 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
