|
|
 | | Re: Worth the wait? (NO!)
|
| (...) I certainly did read it, which prompted my reply. (...) Well cry me a river. Sorry but I don't buy your idea of 'fairness.' LEGO has no obligation to treat a theme with favored or non favored status on the basis that they have 'beaten it down' (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
| (...) Anthony, do PLEASE get a thicker skin! Everybody is thinking that TLC could have picked something else, something better. That's why there are all these posts about what sets should come next -- those are the very sets that a lot of people (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
| Anthony (et al.), I followed these posts-ALL OF THEM-and there was some really good talk on all three sides of the fence (if you count those sittin' on the pickets-ouch!). From a fresh perspective, I would like to say that no one in the thread typed (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
| (...) Well said Anthony, to each his/her own! -Harvey (24 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | (canceled)
|
| |
|
