| |
In lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, Isaac Yue wrote:
| |
Oh, btw, I tend to classify clone brand by the usability of its accessories
by a Lego minifig, and the accessories have to be made in hard ABS plastics
(thus ruling out Kubricks).
|
Uh, wouldn’t that sorta rule out the real LEGO system? Shortswords haven’t been
made in ABS for years, and I don’t believe the minesweeper or cutlass/sabre ever
were. The huge axe and katana never were, and the whip/vine would probably
arrive damaged in many sets if it was. Or do you allow for some accessories to
be made from non-ABS plastic as long as the majority of them are?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Profanity again
|
| (...) Hey, I hadn't thought of that. That also rules out Oxford and Coko, but it may rule-in Stikfas, which are entirely non-compatible, other than their accessories. I stand by my 2x4 brick distintion! Dave! (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Profanity again
|
| Hello, (...) Regarding Dave's comment on the distinction of minifig designs between brands; I have taken the liberty to do a rough comparison of the actual differences between an Oxford minifig and a Lego one. I am posting it (URL) here> as it (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
