Subject:
|
Re: Profanity again
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.terms
|
Date:
|
Thu, 9 Sep 2004 15:33:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
7538 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.terms, Adrian Egli wrote:
And whereas I’d agree on a moral ground, having been a person who doesn’t like
to use profanity in everyday discourse, I do think that things said in o.t-d
can get a little passionate. I’m not advocating usage of profanity in every
post, but, in this instance, Dave! was calling JOHN on the usage of acronyms.
Eh, the fallout is going to be fon on this one...
I think that o.t-d should be like ‘the fight club’--what happens in o.t-d stays
in o.t-d (within reason)
Dave K
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Profanity again
|
| (...) Not *that* passionate, in my view and in the view of the other admins as stated here: (URL) I'm not advocating usage of profanity in (...) Dave subsequently requested a cancel of the post, and reposted without the profanity. As for John's use (...) (20 years ago, 9-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Profanity again
|
| Looks like the problem has returned: (URL) Dave! could have made this comment in a more appropriate manner. Besides, John could have meant "frick'n" instead of the other f-word. Adr. (20 years ago, 9-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
