|
|
 | | Re: MB quality
|
| (...) I'm afraid that that's an unfortunate and (IME) non-representative example. I've built simultaneously larger and flimsier structures that have stood up quite well under their own weight, so something else seems to be at play in your case. (...) (22 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
| | | | | MB quality
|
| (...) Does the nuclear sub with sound element count as being within "the last two to three years"? That set, partially completed (the hull was about 4-5 rows of bricks high) crumbled under its own weight when extended 1 foot off the edge of a table (...) (22 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
| | | | | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
| (...) I agree, my dear Lord Insanity. -- Hop-Frog (22 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
| | | | | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
| (...) The last 2-3 years being the operative phrase there. Prior to that, well... (URL) read here.> That said I agree that within the last 2-3 years Mega Bloks has improved significatly. On a scale of one to ten I would say Lego is a 9 and Mega (...) (22 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
| | | | | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
| (...) Gee, how can I put this politely...I guess I can't! But... You, Mark, are in a newsgroup called "off-topic.clone-brands." Whereas your considered opinions are encouraged, your flat out clone-bashing is not. Now, I'm not the boss of you -- but (...) (22 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
|
