 | | MB quality
|
|
(...) Does the nuclear sub with sound element count as being within "the last two to three years"? That set, partially completed (the hull was about 4-5 rows of bricks high) crumbled under its own weight when extended 1 foot off the edge of a table (...) (21 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
|
(...) I agree, my dear Lord Insanity. -- Hop-Frog (21 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
|
(...) The last 2-3 years being the operative phrase there. Prior to that, well... (URL) read here.> That said I agree that within the last 2-3 years Mega Bloks has improved significatly. On a scale of one to ten I would say Lego is a 9 and Mega (...) (21 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
|
(...) Gee, how can I put this politely...I guess I can't! But... You, Mark, are in a newsgroup called "off-topic.clone-brands." Whereas your considered opinions are encouraged, your flat out clone-bashing is not. Now, I'm not the boss of you -- but (...) (21 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
|
(...) lol, whatever. It is its fitting the bricks are dirty - no matter how they got dirty, or what got them dirty *its fitting they are dirty*. Stop trolling!! Geesh, do you never get tired of this? People like you really make enjoying Lugnet hard (...) (21 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
|
(...) You mean your usual "brand-purist-depart...m-reality" based reply? There's a 99.9% chance that it's printer's ink on those bricks. -- Hop-Frog (21 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
|
(...) Classic, just classic. Mark P (URL) (21 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
|
(...) Yeah, or maybe they just don't care about brand purity! And I, for one, welcome the attitude of our new corporate overlords. I'd like to remind them that as a trusted builder, I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their overground (...) (21 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
|
(...) Thanks for sharing! Note that this is a promotion from IBM Canada (given the URL) so maybe they were showing loyalty to a Canadian company and not as worried about IBM US having won a gig with LEGO US ??? Just guessing. (21 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
|
(...) Hi Dave - no, no reference at all except to IBM. (...) I don't have ready access to a scanner, but I have now taken a few photos - some I left at the highest res my camera can do. They're at (URL) through ibmbloks4.jpg. Notice how they have (...) (21 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
