 | | Re: Apocryphal Blacktron revisited
|
|
(...) Thanks! Your initial suggestion was right on the money--I like the way the finished product looks with the interrupted/irregular top surface. More interesting to the eye. (...) You're witnessing my very first babysteps into animation, thanks (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: Apocryphal Blacktron revisited
|
|
(...) Yeah, I really like this MOC. The details helped, I think. I hadn't noticed the cones on the back of the legs previously, and that's a nice detail. How are you generating your flash file, Dave! Multiple renders out of POV, manipulated in Flash (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: Apocryphal Blacktron revisited
|
|
(...) Still working the bugs out, and I'm afraid that this page won't load any more quickly: (URL) page simply presents three views of a slightly modified b-tron03. The renderings are lower resolution than the previous ones, due to time constraints (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: Apocryphal Blacktron revisited
|
|
(...) I got half of them this morning, the other half did not display. I have past experience with freewebs when the same problem came up. Presenting the images via HTML seemed to eliminate the trouble. None of the links from the original post are (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Apocryphal Blacktron revisited
|
|
(...) freewebs is displaying them fine for me. Am I just lucky? Cheers, (URL) Sci-Fi LEGO> (21 years ago, 30-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
