Clone Brands : 1759


Off-Topic / Clone Brands / 1759	1758 \| 1760

Subject:	Re: Apocryphal Blacktron
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.space
Followup-To:	lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands
Date:	Thu, 12 Jun 2003 12:46:29 GMT
Viewed:	1050 times

In lugnet.space, Dave Schuler wrote: > In lugnet.space, Dave Schuler wrote: > > Here's a little something for the purists: > > > > http://members.bellatlantic.net/~drteeth1/images/b-tron01.jpg > > Reverse view: > http://members.bellatlantic.net/~drteeth1/images/b-tron01a.jpg > > Underside: > http://members.bellatlantic.net/~drteeth1/images/b-tron01b.jpg Here's a followup, with a few disclaimers: 1. Mech design is not my strong suit 2. Neither is camera placement 3. I didn't take as much time as I'd have liked to pose the legs 4. Yes, all the parts are "real" MegaBloks, with the previously-mentioned issue re: trans-yellow http://members.bellatlantic.net/~drteeth1/images/b_mek01a.jpg http://members.bellatlantic.net/~drteeth1/images/b_mek01b.jpg http://members.bellatlantic.net/~drteeth1/images/b_mek01c.jpg Enjoy! Dave!

Message has 2 Replies:

		Re: Apocryphal Blacktron
(...) I've always wondered about a 3 legged mech (sounds like the beginning of a joke), and this has provided an answers. Despite the treasonous medium (jk!), the design is great...very menacing. I wonder if the 'sprinting position' of the legs (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)

		Re: Apocryphal Blacktron
(...) I really like this MOC, except for the third/hind leg. To me, it just looks like it's dragging. I think it makes me want to see the mech with a tail instead though. BTW, are the knees articulated or not? I couldn't quite tell from the images. (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)

5 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search