 | | Re: 2x4 Cheezy Brick Packs Now In Store!
|
|
(...) They'll "self harden" too... Josh (23 years ago, 1-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: 2x4 Cheezy Brick Packs Now In Store!
|
|
(...) Yes, they are real, edible Cheddar cheese. (23 years ago, 1-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: 2x4 Cheezy Brick Packs Now In Store!
|
|
(...) Edible bricks of cheese?! Is this even feasable? Aaah! I don't even want to think about it! Just my two brickz... <<_Matt Hein_>> Lugnet Member No. 1112 (23 years ago, 1-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: 2x4 Cheezy Brick Packs Now In Store!
|
|
Is this for real? I saw that on Brickshelf and figured someone made it up in photoshop. Really funny. :) Bruce (23 years ago, 1-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: 2x4 Cheezy Brick Packs Now In Store!
|
|
(...) Wow. This didn't make OUR paper till today (2 days later). Must be nice to get info ahead of time like that. What I don't get is how they get the cheese not to stick to the molds. Only available in yellow, eh? But if you wait long enough you (...) (23 years ago, 1-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: 2x4 Cheezy Brick Packs Now In Store!
|
|
(...) snip... Be afraid, be very afraid ;) Run Away !! Ray #(1.24 x 10^2) (23 years ago, 1-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Technic scale !? (Re: The Simpsons are going to Blockoland!)
|
|
(...) slightly smaller than technic-fig scale. Their feet can not attach to studs either. That makes them completely useless to me. -Mike Petrucelli (23 years ago, 31-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: Are you going to tell them or am I?
|
|
"Jason J Railton" <j.j.railton@ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:GtJCzy.2Lq@lugnet.com... (...) Magazine (...) picture of (...) Builder® (...) Angels (...) Reality is that I would bet the magazine is put together by folks with little real (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: Are you going to tell them or am I?
|
|
(...) That's shocking. I'm speculating now, but I wonder how many pictures of kids with genuine LEGO COTS models actually get sent in to the magazine and get filtered out? I mean, would you think of sending in a picture of a known set? Probably not. (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Are you going to tell them or am I?
|
|
[snip] (...) Well everything I have read on Lugnet about TLC, seems to indicate that they operate in a bubble. They do not recognize the fact that Mega Bloks is a serious competitor. I would not be surprised if the Lego upper management does not (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Are you going to tell them or am I?
|
|
(...) He might be. April is fast approaching... --Bill. (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Are you going to tell them or am I?
|
|
"Dave Schuler" <orrex@excite.com> wrote in message news:GtJGJ2.C79@lugnet.com... (...) of (...) Angels (...) polices (...) I agree. I would love to see a scan of this or of the earlier Mega Blok model that got in the magazine. -Jon -- | The Galactic (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Are you going to tell them or am I?
|
|
"Matt Hein" <Pyrokid17@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:GtJzAv.MpM@lugnet.com... (...) Magazine (...) of (...) Angels (...) This isn't the first time this has happened. (URL) they either did not know or did not solve the problem. I can't believe (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Are you going to tell them or am I?
|
|
(...) Whoa! You're kidding, right? (...) Scary...let's just hope Lego doesn't do this again... ;^( (...) Who knows?! I certainly hope this was a mistake, although the chances of mega-blocks getting into the Lego UK magazine are slim on their own. (...) (23 years ago, 25-Mar-02, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The Simpsons are going to Blockoland!
|
|
(...) They're not just similar, they have all the same dimensions! Now I'm going to have to go over to Toy Tokyo and verify it all. -Erik (23 years ago, 25-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: The Simpsons are going to Blockoland!
|
|
(...) figure's collective butts. Matt (23 years ago, 25-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: The Simpsons are going to Blockoland!
|
|
The Blockoland Simpsons look just like Kubricks, though I can't prove it. (URL) official page (Japanese) (URL) saw Kubricks Planet of the Apes figure sets in Previews in January. At Toy Fair they showed Reservoir Dogs figures. Simpsons would be (...) (23 years ago, 25-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: The Simpsons are going to Blockoland!
|
|
(...) Took a look...did a Simpson shudder. I see they included Carl, but no Lenny. I hope he's ok. Julie (23 years ago, 25-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: The Simpsons are going to Blockoland!
|
|
(...) Doh! My fault for imprecise wording. I wasn't trying to accuse you yourself of being a Simpsons zealot, but I was trying to say "avoid these unless you (the "general" you) are a total fanboy." Sorry for the confusion. And, for what it's worth, (...) (23 years ago, 25-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: The Simpsons are going to Blockoland!
|
|
(...) Yikes! $28 bucks for (acording to the box) about 100 pieces. I would not pay that for real Lego let alone a clone. Now on clearance they might be worth it despite the irregularities. (And in reference to the other post; for the record Dave, I (...) (23 years ago, 25-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
