 | | Re: Do you think there are too many Lego® groups on Flickr?
|
|
(...) I hear that he's an active overseer at Wikipedia now. (17 years ago, 19-Feb-09, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Do you think there are too many Lego® groups on Flickr?
|
|
(...) And at least one of the .o-t curators seems to be long gone, but I could be wrong. Richie Dulin CO Legeaux (17 years ago, 18-Feb-09, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Do you think there are too many Lego® groups on Flickr?
|
|
(...) I wasn't sure that anybody actually reads o-t.d anymore. (17 years ago, 18-Feb-09, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Do you think there are too many Lego® groups on Flickr?
|
|
(...) A good question, CM Bob. There certainly seems to be a lot of them these days, some of which seem to have a narrow focus (there's even one called 'LEGO® Complaining'!). At the moment I cope with the huge number of LEGO groups by the simple (...) (17 years ago, 18-Feb-09, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New Mega blok Gundam
|
|
(...) This excellent news could only be made better by an announcement that these kits would be widely available outside of Asia! Though I understand that licensing issues are at work, it's maddening that such cool sets should be isolated to one (...) (17 years ago, 15-Feb-09, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
