|
|
 | | Re: Meta Question
|
| (...) That seems to be the consensus. But I don't see any Rock Raiders offshoot sites, which from my external perspective makes it look less about format, and more about cherry-picking... BICBVW! (...) Well, I don't think it's that hard considering (...) (18 years ago, 17-Jan-08, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Meta Question
|
| (...) --snip-- (...) I'm not exactly sure that anyone has attempted to start a new site 'to make a few bucks'. I have my doubts that anyone even could. I believe the first offshoot sites were started due to disagreements about the running and format (...) (18 years ago, 17-Jan-08, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Meta Question
|
| Thanks for the detailed recap! (...) I agree (although that's probably a bit off-topic for off-topic.debate) - I have quite an irrational fondness for this little corner of the internet. Richard (18 years ago, 17-Jan-08, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Meta Question
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Adrian Egli wrote: A good question! For certain, RTL did not make a comeback. The theory I've heard is the growth of theme group sites like Classic Space outside of Lugnet have drawn readers away from Lugnet. I always (...) (18 years ago, 17-Jan-08, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Tony test 1
|
| tony test 1 (18 years ago, 16-Jan-08, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
|
