 | | Re: To No One's Big Surprise...
|
| (...) NO dave, Everyone knows with an infinite number of monkeys you get the works of Shakespear. NOT Picasso. Once again, proving that Janey, and her monkey abstract art is NOT art. but really, just a pile of monkey SH-- (1) Chris 1. not at all (...) (19 years ago, 24-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: To No One's Big Surprise...
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, C. L. GunningCook wrote: snip (...) So if you had an infinite number of monkeys flinging an infinite amount of monkey-poo around, would you get a picasso? One wonders... Dave K (19 years ago, 24-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | this is just a test
|
| SCNR (19 years ago, 24-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | this is just a test #2
|
| see? (19 years ago, 24-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Re: To No One's Big Surprise...
|
| (...) Okay... I am officially "grrrrring" at my favourite rtlers. Darn geeks! Grrr and Grrr... I think I will go make an abstract painting that represents my disillusionment with you both! Or I may have my untrained monkey do it for me. Janey "If MY (...) (19 years ago, 23-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
|
