 | | First post, NNTP-test
|
| Just another boring test. One, two, three... or sumfn. Link-test: (URL) Image-test: (URL) (19 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
| | | | | Re: ADDFOL
|
| (...) I'm intrigued, Jim, why this post in o-t.t? Was it a test, and you just wanted to write something in the body of the post other than the hackneyed "test"? Or did you get the group wrong? (It certainly seems neither to be off topic nor a test). (...) (19 years ago, 19-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Re: ADDFOL
|
| (...) I'm afraid that I must disagree, Mr. Crawford. Space!, Trains and Town are all way vooler IMHO. And easier to build MOCs in since they use liberal amounts of studded bricks and almost no panels. But I will keep this civil since you are (...) (19 years ago, 19-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: ADDFOL
|
| (...) Never mind. A good, stern lecture from a responsible adult should set things right. (19 years ago, 19-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Re: ADDFOL
|
| (...) Maybe he was sticking to LEGO-unique habits as opposed to generic ones (although I suspect festival muckraking is fairly generic to hobbies). Tim (19 years ago, 19-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Re: ADDFOL
|
| (...) You forgot to add "trolling" to the list. (19 years ago, 19-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Re: ADDFOL
|
| (...) HEY!! What's wrong with theme wars???...??? TECHNIC RULZ!!!!!! ROSCO (19 years ago, 19-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Re: Smallest cube ever!?
|
| (...) Although it would appear my terminology disagreed with my maths ;) So you are right in your reading and I am wrong in my concept but not my principal. So to keep the terminology the same just replace all 5s by 2s and the rest remains the same. (...) (19 years ago, 19-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Smallest cube ever!?
|
| (...) It's still an integer number of plates (which was my condition). Tim (19 years ago, 19-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Smallest cube ever!?
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Timothy Gould wrote: (snip) (...) I'm not so sure about that... If I understand correctly, the main issue here is to produce a flat square surface with a non-integer number of studs as side, right? Because that is certainly (...) (19 years ago, 19-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
|
