 | | Re: Smallest cube ever!?
|
| (...) It's still an integer number of plates (which was my condition). Tim (20 years ago, 19-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Smallest cube ever!?
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Timothy Gould wrote: (snip) (...) I'm not so sure about that... If I understand correctly, the main issue here is to produce a flat square surface with a non-integer number of studs as side, right? Because that is certainly (...) (20 years ago, 19-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
| | | | | ADDFOL
|
| I remain astonished by the sophomoric stubbornness persistently exhibited by so-called "adult" fans of LEGO on this web site. I am curious if it is a developmental artifact of the kind of intellect that appreciates the challenges of building with (...) (20 years ago, 19-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test) !
| | | | | Re: Lego Spider-man 3?
|
| (...) **snip** (...) That has puzzled me as well, and it makes cataloguing a bit of a headache, when there are a dozen sets called "Spider-Man." (...) I'm guessing that the #2004 Sandman's Bank Heist and #2002 Green Goblin's Secret Lab probably (...) (20 years ago, 19-Mar-07, to lugnet.licensed.spiderman, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
| | | | | Re: Lego Spider-man 3?
|
| (...) Sorry, MegaBloks now holds the license for Spider-man 3. AFAIK LEGO hasn't said anything about letting the license lapse and MegaBloks hasn't issued any press releases about obtaining the license. However, in the last 2 weeks I have seen 5 (...) (20 years ago, 17-Mar-07, to lugnet.licensed.spiderman, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
|
