To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / *53688 (-5)
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) I prefer to think of Al as a jerk with the lot. ROSCO (20 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) See, Al, at the end of the day, you're just a plain jerk. JOHN (20 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) In fact it wasn't all online. (...) It wasn't. And the FAQ doesn't say it was. It says "it started making sense to have a group that could participate online". I see no "need" in that excerpt at all. Just as there was no "need" for the (...) (20 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) <snip> (...) <snip> Verbose? Who, me?? Dave K -no one around here but us scarecrows... (20 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) Actually, there ARE other ways-- ish-- but they're not easy! And they're not necessarily open to everyone. For instance, an admin could check on the Lugnet server to see how many times he's logged in. But it's not public information. You can (...) (20 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more
Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR