 | | Re: New TLC standard for containers?
|
|
(...) No doubt it's pleasant but it's a shipping container so it should be practical and is this unappealling ;) Tim (20 years ago, 23-Dec-06, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New TLC standard for containers?
|
|
(...) I don't know what I was thinking when I wrote 3:2. I meant that 6:10 is just off the golden ratio of 6:9.7... Though I was confused there, you make the case that the aspect ratio is actually a pleasant one, as opposed to your initial (...) (20 years ago, 23-Dec-06, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New TLC standard for containers?
|
|
(...) actually 10:6 = 5:3 = 1.66 is closer to the golden mean (1.618...) than 3:2 = 1.5 ;) (...) Moved to .o-t.geek (20 years ago, 23-Dec-06, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Test
|
|
{MERRY CHRISTMAS} Here's hoping you have a happy LEGO Christmas! Gary Istok ~ (URL) (20 years ago, 22-Dec-06, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: Hello testing
|
|
(...) Testing my replies.... (20 years ago, 21-Dec-06, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
