To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / *53258 (-5)
  Re: The Brick Testament - More Teachings of Jesus
 
(...) Here's how: The omniscient, omnipotent being always was, by definition. Irrational? You bet. (...) Are you suggesting that this stuff is in some way simple? (...) Though we've met a few times, you don't really know me that well because I'm (...) (20 years ago, 25-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: The Brick Testament - More Teachings of Jesus
 
(...) I hear that! I'm going to do some snipping to clean up a bit around the thread. (...) <snip> (...) Not at all. I'm just seeing common ground. (...) But you will probably always be irrational though you strive to be rational. You are a closet (...) (20 years ago, 25-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  This is a new test
 
Here is a test with a link to (URL) Google's website> in it. (20 years ago, 25-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
 
  Re: The Brick Testament - More Teachings of Jesus
 
(...) Actually, it didn't really happen in a point in time, AFAIAC. Time began at that point. In fact, there's a good chance that "time" didn't "begin" (or stabilize) for "eons" (read in femto- or pico- seconds), just as our physics framework (as we (...) (20 years ago, 25-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Brick Testament - More Teachings of Jesus
 
(...) Occam's Razor - the onus is on YOU to explain how an omniscient being just came into being, then created the universe. And if that being was created by another, who created *that* being (ad nauseum)?... Why must you insist on making things (...) (20 years ago, 25-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more
Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR