 | | Re: The God Game!
|
| (...) Depending on how you define your operators they may not be. If I define the operator +(a,b) to be what we would conventionally term +(a,2b) and define (-1) as that number which ensures that +(1,(-1))=0 (ie (-1)=-1/2) then the two equations are (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: New Cobi/Best-Lock
|
| (...) (URL) Here you go>, Mr. Smartypants! The sixth scan is the decal sheet, of which four identical copies came in the set I bought. That canopy element is fantastic! Dave! (21 years ago, 25-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
| | | | | Re: The God Game!
|
| (...) To sum earlier discussion-- Dave! does not believe that the following equations are equal-- 1 + (-1) = 0 (-1) + 1 = 0 ;) Dave K (21 years ago, 25-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: The God Game!
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Timothy Gould wrote: <snip> Their is one notable flaws of logic in this test. They compare the burden (...) That's the question that hung me up. Dave K (21 years ago, 25-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: The God Game!
|
| (...) I got struck with a hit on that one as well: "As long as there are no compelling arguments or evidence that show that God does not exist, atheism is a matter of faith, not rationality." "If, despite years of trying, no strong evidence or (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: The God Game!
|
| (...) Would you also argue that the statement "people who believe in God must make a leap of faith" is too broad and non-specific? (...) I would have to say that you are either an agnostic or you have made a leap of faith. It is my opinion that an (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: The God Game!
|
| (...) I don't want to start a whole big thing here, but I'd take issue with that statement as being too broad and non-specific. One form of atheism--the belief that God does not exist--may require a leap of faith, but that's not the only form. I, (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: The God Game!
|
| (...) Tricky. I had to go back to that class I took back in my Catholic HS days to think through those questions. In the end I scored zero hits and bit twice. Adr. (21 years ago, 25-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: The God Game!
|
| (...) Yeah. It's a massively flawed argument IMO. (...) I'm making the point that atheism is as much of a leap of (not)faith as religion is a leap of faith. Thus although I know that agnosticism is logical (as there is nor proof for or against) I (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: The God Game!
|
| (...) Thanks for the parenthetical presumably, Dave! ;-) Fellow 1 bullet biter, JOHN (21 years ago, 25-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
|
