To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / *52658 (-5)
  Re: The God Game!
 
(...) Would you also argue that the statement "people who believe in God must make a leap of faith" is too broad and non-specific? (...) I would have to say that you are either an agnostic or you have made a leap of faith. It is my opinion that an (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: The God Game!
 
(...) I don't want to start a whole big thing here, but I'd take issue with that statement as being too broad and non-specific. One form of atheism--the belief that God does not exist--may require a leap of faith, but that's not the only form. I, (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: The God Game!
 
(...) Tricky. I had to go back to that class I took back in my Catholic HS days to think through those questions. In the end I scored zero hits and bit twice. Adr. (21 years ago, 25-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The God Game!
 
(...) Yeah. It's a massively flawed argument IMO. (...) I'm making the point that atheism is as much of a leap of (not)faith as religion is a leap of faith. Thus although I know that agnosticism is logical (as there is nor proof for or against) I (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: The God Game!
 
(...) Thanks for the parenthetical presumably, Dave! ;-) Fellow 1 bullet biter, JOHN (21 years ago, 25-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more
Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR