 | | Re: Trouble with Bloks forum?
|
|
(...) Look, are you insinuating something? Oh, nooooo, nooo, no. Yes. Is your wife... a goer? Eh? Know what I mean? Know what I mean? Wink. Wink. Nudge. Nudge. Say no more! JOHN (21 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!
|
|
(...) lol For the record, I signed up again with yet another email addy, and was summarily nuked; they must checking IPs. I have officially given up life in the underground. Pity. (...) Agreed. (...) I wasn't a whiney child (so I'm told), and I did (...) (21 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!
|
|
(...) I read about this on a certain Other Forum and basically said "eh." It's a too-small sample size from a too-small geographic area. I'd say it's close to meaningless, and in any case the factors of adolescent life and parental leanings likely (...) (21 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Trouble with Bloks forum?
|
|
(...) John, this is a family forum. Please refrain from such blue language, or else FUT lugnet.off-topic.nau...y-innuendo Dave! (21 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!
|
|
(...) Would you explain what points you disagree with? It seems a fairly narrow but objective study to me and a surpringly well written science article about the study. Tim (21 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
