 | | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
| (...) Remember that Tootsie Pop® commercial where the "scientist" is doing the experiment to finally find out how many licks does it take to reach the center of the Tootsie Pop sucker? "One, two, thareee, <crunch>...." "Three." As for our story and (...) (21 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Danish cartoons outrage some Moslem groups and nations
|
| (...) Well, if you accept the premise that the baby in utero (thanks for the clarification above) is a person, then certainly the State has the obligation to protect that person's rights (namely, to live). So, by comparison, if a mother tires of her (...) (21 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Population control -- was Re: Danish cartoons outrage some Moslem groups and nations
|
| (...) See, I'm kinda with Dave! on this one--if it's a black and white issue--i.e. the second the sperm touches the egg it's LIFE! then there would be no issue. But people haven't been able to come to a consensus for, well, ever yet as to when life (...) (21 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Heads up, atheists
|
| (...) Then again, maybe it (URL) was thrown out.> Personally, I thought that the whole undertaking was a waste of time. Good riddance to some pointless litigation. Dave! (21 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Danish cartoons outrage some Moslem groups and nations
|
| (...) The question becomes "why must the rights of the embryo or fetus supersede the rights of the woman?" I've never heard a compelling answer to that question. (...) It has been helpful for me, in discussions like this, to add the term "viable" to (...) (21 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
|
