 | | Re: What the? Hydraulics
|
|
(...) :-) (21 years ago, 23-Nov-05, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | test post by mail
|
|
testing body for post by mail Jason ===...=== Jason Glazer, P.E. jglazer AT gard DOT com 847 698 5686 GARD Analytics - (URL) Busse Highway, Park Ridge, IL 60068 Building Energy Simulation and Analysis Admin of BLDG-SIM list for building simulation (...) (21 years ago, 21-Nov-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: Excellent news!
|
|
(...) And (URL) this guy> was executed, so the point is served again. Dave! (21 years ago, 21-Nov-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: foo foo foo
|
|
(...) We have push-button phones down here, too. All the modern conveniences. And before rec.toys.lego there was alt.toys.lego. And you thought that "ATL" was just half of a javelin-thrower. Dave! (21 years ago, 21-Nov-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: We just never seem to learn, do we?
|
|
(...) I agree that the argument is not logically complete, but it is still not an example of the fallacy. The fallacy applies when it is used to link activities which were not a major part of the 'evil' Nazi activities to 'evil'. In this case he is (...) (21 years ago, 20-Nov-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: We just never seem to learn, do we?
|
|
(...) However, the quote given doesn't logically link up. He mentions something historical about Hitler, but doesn't link it to his argument. Further, his argument is made without using the Hitler reference - his only note is that we need to (...) (21 years ago, 20-Nov-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: We just never seem to learn, do we?
|
|
(...) Except that the argument there is not an example of the fallacy. He is comparing right-wing organisations who propose the banning of gay groups to a rather famous right-wing organisation which banned gay groups which is a perfectly valid (...) (21 years ago, 20-Nov-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | We just never seem to learn, do we?
|
|
First of all, the article: (URL) and now, to put it into some perspective: (URL) Perspective> -Avery (21 years ago, 20-Nov-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: foo foo foo
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.test, Dave Schuler wrote: <snip> (...) What?? THere was an rtl before rtlToronto???? How does that work?? Dave K -who understands that the Big Smoke really is the centre of the universe... (21 years ago, 19-Nov-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | a little test is in order
|
|
well hello! (21 years ago, 19-Nov-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | on this thing is?
|
|
. (21 years ago, 18-Nov-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: foo foo foo
|
|
(...) Rec Toys Lego, you canuck-centric hoser. I wouldn't venture above the 49th Parallel for all the back bacon in Saskatoon. Dave! (21 years ago, 18-Nov-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: foo foo foo
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.test, Dave Schuler wrote: <snip> (...) Don't go there!!! They're a nasty bunch!! Them and their little crazy Canadian ways of doing things there!!! Dave K (21 years ago, 18-Nov-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: foo foo foo
|
|
(...) Well, I have to admit that that wasn't much clearer, but I'll trust that you know what you're doing... I was so worried that I even ventured onto RTL to ask wassup. Dave! (21 years ago, 18-Nov-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: foo foo foo
|
|
(...) Yeah, definitely something wrong. Under hood, looks a problem with the checker that periodically double-checks whether xinetd is happy. I tweaked a regex and I hope this will help. --Todd (21 years ago, 18-Nov-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: foo foo foo
|
|
(...) Something's wrong--all that's coming through is "blah blah blah" and "hrrrmmm." Dave! (21 years ago, 18-Nov-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | bar bar bar
|
|
hmmm! (21 years ago, 18-Nov-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: foo foo foo
|
|
(...) hrrrmmm (21 years ago, 18-Nov-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | foo foo foo
|
|
blah blah blah (21 years ago, 18-Nov-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: SCC rules in favour of Mega Bloks in Lego battle
|
|
(...) Thanks for linking to this story. I'd dispute one point, though: (...) That's technically true if you cherry-pick which Mega Bloks you want to test, but then the same can be said of LEGO:LEGO linking. Micro-scale Mega Bloks are almost 100% (...) (21 years ago, 17-Nov-05, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
