 | | Re: The Guardian unworthy of toilet paper?
|
| (...) Appropriate? Don't know if I use that word. Listen, most of the news churned out by the media is pure pulp. Think Hollywood. I couldn't care less about a star's private life; in fact, the less I know about it, the better for them, because I (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | CD instructions
|
| Hello I'm JAC, My last modell, is another truck, yet. And, I like to have more informations of my MOC, to built another one easely. Before, I took a lot of photos, but, this time, I create a CD informations, and I propose to sell someone. You can (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Test
|
| Hi, just to see, if my message go well (21 years ago, 7-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Re: The Guardian unworthy of toilet paper?
|
| (...) Hey, something just occurred to me. With your above statement in mind, would you say that it is appropriate or inappropriate to have a citizen's private extramarital affair dragged through the media for months on end? Just curious... As (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Bennett IS unworthy of being used as toilet paper
|
| (...) Because he is neither the idiot nor the racist he's painted to be. (...) Fair enough. (...) Well, yes, because I know of him and know his politics, and so I know that the charges against him are baseless. As far as "defending Bennett to get at (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
|
