 | | Re: Bennett IS unworthy of being used as toilet paper
|
| (...) -snippity snip snip- (...) This is the part that is making everyone upset. Bennett is saying that blacks are a large source of crime, and is linking "criminality" to "blackness." He IS using reducio ad absurdum, but he is using it on the issue (...) (21 years ago, 6-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Can this guy get any more infuriating???
|
| (URL) Bush, in a high-profile address on Thursday, said the global fight against terrorism must continue in Iraq because it is where terrorists are centering their war on humanity. "We're facing a radical ideology with an unalterable objective, to (...) (21 years ago, 6-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate) !
| | | | | Re: Bennett IS unworthy of being used as toilet paper
|
| (...) They won't say it because it is patently absurd, just as Bennett was arguing reductio ad absurdum. (...) ???!! I'm sleighed, -->Bruce<-- (...) Come on! You seriously can't think that Bennett had any inkling that this action was anything but (...) (21 years ago, 6-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Screw Abstinence?
|
| (...) Yes but in the context of this argument it is irrelevant whether or not the implicit support also applies to other things, in a debate on abortion it is the stance on abortion that is most important. That said, I somewhat agree with bringing (...) (21 years ago, 6-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Screw Abstinence?
|
| (...) Oh? I didn't think that was what was desired. I could believe that there are some out there who would be in favor of it, but I think in general, they're talking abortions within the first few months of pregnancy. Correct me if I'm wrong, of (...) (21 years ago, 6-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
|
