 | | Re: MegaBloks
|
|
(...) After many years of LEGO purchases, I've recently added some MB sets. As I live in Denmark, I can buy only LEGO in the stores, and pays the very high price accordingly. So to get MB sets, I have to buy from UK or USA. I have bought quite a (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jul-05, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: MegaBloks
|
|
(...) Did i mention the MB Dragon’s line somewhere?!? (I don't think i linked to it?) Actually i was referring to their new 'Pyrate' line and how they reinvented the minifig that really got my attention. Interestingly enough though, the Dragon line (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jul-05, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: MegaBloks
|
|
(...) Thanx-man! I actually totally forgot about that! Plus, i never really wanna leave Lugnet, i'm here for the people, they just 'happen' to share the same enthusiasm for a hobby we all enjoy. Peace, --==Richard==-- (21 years ago, 4-Jul-05, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: MegaBloks
|
|
(...) Hi Kirby thanks for your response! I can see in the next few years Megabloks gaining greater market share and continuing to improve it's product line in terms of quality, realism and general appeal to a wider youth audience then Lego. (...) (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jul-05, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.castle, lugnet.pirates)
|
| |
| | Re: MegaBloks
|
|
(...) I try not to aknowledge the Junior line. Though I have bought some Junior sets at deep discount for some chrome pcs and out of curiosity as to what I might be able to do with some of the parts. Most of the pcs went to my kids who gleefully (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jul-05, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: MegaBloks
|
|
(...) I personally don't know - but Lugnet DOES have a forum for discussing Megabloks and other clone brands: (URL) . You'll probably get more information there. -Lenny :followups to o-t.clone-brands (21 years ago, 3-Jul-05, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general, lugnet.pirates, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: Is there a standard syntax?
|
|
(...) Doh! It looks as though, once again, you're correct. As it turns out, the old "file.bat" accessed a location on the network, rather than the internet. Darn it. Thanks for ending my wild goose chase, though. Dave! (21 years ago, 30-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Is there a standard syntax?
|
|
(...) That works if the site is on your windows network, so you can access it as \\hostname\path\to\file... But if it's not available, I don't think it's doable... Say, if you try to copy (URL) to your local drive, I don't think it'll work. But I'd (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Is there a standard syntax?
|
|
(...) I wish I could remember or find it, but it was something dirt-simple like this: copy //www.doofus.com/dol...d/fool.txt c:\network\fool.txt but I can't recall the formatting, and that's the whole problem. Dave! (21 years ago, 30-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Is there a standard syntax?
|
|
(...) Does that mean that XP provides an internal way to download files? How does that work? Can you show us that one line? :) (21 years ago, 30-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
