To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / *38739 (-10)
  Re: IGNORANT views fuel oppression?
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes: <snip> (...) This is not clarification. You concede that my interpretation could be one way of reading what you said, i.e. "You think that others are ignoring you because you believe your point is (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Now whereabouts on the axis of evil can we be?
 
(...) Canada is only such good country due to the large amounts of my countrymen who went out to help build it! ;) There was quite a good show on TV here last week about the Scots-Canadians who returned to fight for Great Britain in WW1. The main (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: stopping topics vs. dealing with troublemakers and nonconstructive participants
 
(...) I seem to remember that the last time we interacted here, your post was described as an “extreme overreaction”… and you were advised to ignore me. ;) (...) …and I am still grateful for that and your continued involvement on Lugnet (...) As I (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: IGNORANT views fuel oppression?
 
(...) Clarification: I do not think what you claim. I accept that my statement could be interpreted in that way. However, it is not the only way it may be interpreted and it is not the way I meant it to be interpreted. (...) Now you are not being (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Now whereabouts on the axis of evil can we be?
 
(...) King Jean until the right finally realize that when they're split, the libs will remain in power until the end of time. The NDP, being the 5th party in a 5 party system, will not cut into the libs majority enuf to count. I don't agree with the (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Nemesis, thread two (Re: Two Towers (was Re: Fellowship))
 
(...) Yeah, that's what I explained to them. In 'Star Trek' time, Voyager would have been home for a year or two before the events in this movie happened--presumably getting Voyager home mostly intact would have gained a promotion for Janeway. (...) (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Nemesis
 
(...) I don't recall any movie stating, "And it has N decks," but I do admit I'm trying my hardest to forget Insurrection. Okay, not quite my hardest; people keep telling me there was a movie between _The Voyage Home_ and _The Undiscovered (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Nemesis, thread two (Re: Two Towers (was Re: Fellowship))
 
(...) Not sure of all the details (because I'm only a part-time geek), but I presume Janeway made the film for continuity's sake and because Jeri Ryan is busy with Boston Public. As far as the Romulans & Borg, there was some TNG episode regarding a (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Now whereabouts on the axis of evil can we be?
 
(...) One thing in the article that was wrong was the statement that the majority of the country was not right wing. Don't forget the right wing vote is divided between 3 parties Alliance, PC and BQ which have the majority of the popular vote (but (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Now whereabouts on the axis of evil can we be?
 
(...) I love being Canadian. Yep, article pretty much sums up the prevailing winds around here. Though, to be said, looks as if this writer took some of his research from an article in the Toronto Star--I posted a link to it earlier and right now (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR