 | | Just testing
|
|
hi (22 years ago, 15-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: TJ acknowledged a Creator in DoI (was: Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
|
|
Despite my better Judgement I am going to get sucked into this debate. (If only to prove to Dave! that someone who belives God created the universe is capable of rational thought.) (...) First off John, I want to make it perfectly clear that I (...) (22 years ago, 15-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Still fiddling with HES Sirius
|
|
(...) Mmmmm. Tried a bunch of different ways. Next best is to dangle them below a docking arm, underneath the ship, which is cool, but means the ship can't land. I'm not really attached to landing per se, but since the ship has to sit around on a (...) (22 years ago, 15-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: New Dragons Set!
|
|
(...) could let us know how much it cost? -Mike Petrucelli (22 years ago, 15-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: fun with confirmation emails!
|
|
Hmm. It seems to do nothing. Next, I will test telling the server to delete the post, and then telling it to post it. (...) (22 years ago, 14-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | fun with confirmation emails!
|
|
This is a test to see what happens if I confirm a post, and then reply to the email again, this time telling it to delete it. (22 years ago, 14-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: Tribute to Sept 11, 2001
|
|
Many thanks for viewing our work. Always remember and never forget what happened on September 11, 2001! ACPin & Sons (...) (22 years ago, 14-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Original Smiley Found (-:
|
|
(...) Its main benefit, of course, is that it doesn't smell so much! Cheers, - jsproat (22 years ago, 14-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Original Smiley Found (-:
|
|
(...) (22 years ago, 14-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: TJ acknowledged a Creator in DoI (was: Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
|
|
(...) What exactly do you mean by that? That all of *yours* are indeed *fact*? The FACT is that the POA stands-- defending it one way or the other is opinion. But I am willing to drop the whole issue until it is decided by the SC. But I know that if (...) (22 years ago, 14-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Still fiddling with HES Sirius
|
|
(...) Too cool! Took a look at it, and I was intrigued. Really neat design, kind of reminds me of those science fiction ships from star trek and what not. Anyway, hope to see more like this. <<_Matt Hein_>> Fellow lego enthusiast (22 years ago, 14-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: Bathing the cat
|
|
Or the Kid! (URL) (22 years ago, 14-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Still fiddling with HES Sirius
|
|
(...) Dude, that's pretty sweet! The starfurries look good, but I agree that there should be some form of inclosed docking arm for the pilots. But given the size of the Sirius relative to the fighters, that may not be possible. Love the (...) (22 years ago, 14-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: New Dragons Set!
|
|
(...) My sons and I are devotees of the Dragons line, as well as keen chess players (as opposed to good chess players). Not only does this set make a great chess set, but the playability looks high as well. Can't wait to see it out here in the (...) (22 years ago, 14-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Still fiddling with HES Sirius
|
|
Can't help myself. Bad habits. :-) (URL) with extra Starfuries, bigger engines, and an energy shotgun that will make your enemies' eyes pop (just before their heads explode). Might have gone just about as far as I can with this hull now. I hope to (...) (22 years ago, 14-Sep-02, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | New Dragons Set!
|
|
There is a new Megabloks Dragons set! Including a new dragon. This set builds a chess set from the figures, horses, castle elements, etc. It includes six of the large base pieces, and a bunch of other stuff. One of the neatest things about it is (...) (22 years ago, 14-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: TJ acknowledged a Creator in DoI (was: Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
|
|
(...) I don't like to see John stating his own opinions as facts either, esp. when much of what he has to say is contrary to the facts as understood and accepted by the rest of us. The Constitution trumps all other laws. Even the preamble is not (...) (22 years ago, 13-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Original Smiley Found (-:
|
|
Wow: "The smiley :-) and its many variants are an important (and fun!) part of the worldwide online social culture -- allowing emotions to be conveyed in plain text. It has been in widespread use since the early '80s, when it was first proposed. (...) (22 years ago, 13-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: TJ acknowledged a Creator in DoI (was: Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
|
|
(...) To no avail, apparently. Your inability to reason is invulnerable. (...) What do you want to hear, John? That "their Creator" should be stripped frm the Declaration of Independence? Fine, I certainly support that. As Dave K has correctly (...) (22 years ago, 13-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: TJ acknowledged a Creator in DoI (was: Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
|
|
(...) Gee, Dave! we simpletons shur 'preshiate when you smart folk done make it easy-like fer us to understand;-) (...) "Congress shall pass no laws respecting religion or the free exercise thereof;..." What do you mean by "issue any declaration"? (...) (22 years ago, 13-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
