 | | Just testing
|
|
hi (22 years ago, 15-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: TJ acknowledged a Creator in DoI (was: Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
|
|
Despite my better Judgement I am going to get sucked into this debate. (If only to prove to Dave! that someone who belives God created the universe is capable of rational thought.) (...) First off John, I want to make it perfectly clear that I (...) (22 years ago, 15-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Still fiddling with HES Sirius
|
|
(...) Mmmmm. Tried a bunch of different ways. Next best is to dangle them below a docking arm, underneath the ship, which is cool, but means the ship can't land. I'm not really attached to landing per se, but since the ship has to sit around on a (...) (22 years ago, 15-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: New Dragons Set!
|
|
(...) could let us know how much it cost? -Mike Petrucelli (22 years ago, 15-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: fun with confirmation emails!
|
|
Hmm. It seems to do nothing. Next, I will test telling the server to delete the post, and then telling it to post it. (...) (22 years ago, 14-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | fun with confirmation emails!
|
|
This is a test to see what happens if I confirm a post, and then reply to the email again, this time telling it to delete it. (22 years ago, 14-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: Tribute to Sept 11, 2001
|
|
Many thanks for viewing our work. Always remember and never forget what happened on September 11, 2001! ACPin & Sons (...) (22 years ago, 14-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Original Smiley Found (-:
|
|
(...) Its main benefit, of course, is that it doesn't smell so much! Cheers, - jsproat (22 years ago, 14-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Original Smiley Found (-:
|
|
(...) (22 years ago, 14-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: TJ acknowledged a Creator in DoI (was: Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
|
|
(...) What exactly do you mean by that? That all of *yours* are indeed *fact*? The FACT is that the POA stands-- defending it one way or the other is opinion. But I am willing to drop the whole issue until it is decided by the SC. But I know that if (...) (22 years ago, 14-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
