 | | Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
|
|
(...) As long as you understand that "Young Hedonists for Satan" has the same rights of access and same protection under the law... Brucifer Devil's Advocate for the Day :-) (22 years ago, 10-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Re: The ballets are in.. attn: Daniel
|
|
(...) Nothing wrong with that - as long as the shirt is inside out! G. (22 years ago, 10-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
|
|
(...) When you adequately explain from where our government claims our rights originate, then we can talk about the constitutionality of "God language". -John (22 years ago, 10-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
|
|
(...) If "apples" = "why does the State in one case have the right to endorse or restrict religion" and "oranges" = "why does the State not have the right to endorse or restrict religion," then I am indeed comparing apples and oranges. What's your (...) (22 years ago, 10-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
|
|
(...) Apples and Oranges... In this one, a bonafide extra-curricular school group deserves the same status as any other extracurricular school group. It'd be like saying--'Hey you in the Chess club--we think you're geeky so you don't get any (...) (22 years ago, 10-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
|
|
(URL) this the same 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals that recently ruled unconstitutional the phrase "under God" in the Congressionally-endorsed Pledge of Allegiance? Are Senators Byrd and Lott and Daschle and all the rest going to bitch about how (...) (22 years ago, 10-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | yat
|
|
yet another test (22 years ago, 10-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | New Message from BWP
|
|
Testing a new message. (22 years ago, 10-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
|
| |
| | Re: test 426
|
|
(...) This is a test. (22 years ago, 10-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: Farscape Cancelled-Geeks Up In Arms!
|
|
Hey I'm right here with ya (or your wife). I have no cable (or reception for that matter) and hate TV but I love Farscape and try to keep up with it via downloads. While I think this is terrible that they are canceling it I'm really not surprised at (...) (22 years ago, 10-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
