 | | Re: Help defend the artist! (was Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!)
|
|
Eric Sophie wrote in message ... (...) Eric, re this and your previous remark: the guy has been investigated for *allegations*. Not convicted. Innocent until proved guilty, remember? And given that the source of all our info on this so far is the (...) (22 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| |
| | Re: Help defend the artist! (was Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!)
|
|
True, true. I concede. e (22 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| |
| | Re: Help defend the artist! (was Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!)
|
|
(...) I was googling around yesterday and found another paper that carried the story. No idea if they were just re-reporting what was said (URL) also found what I THINK is the website in question, but it appears to be gone (URL) google cached it (...) (22 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| |
| | Re: Help defend the artist! (was Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!)
|
|
(...) Although it wasn't the article which made this elected(?) member resign, it can not be helping the court of public opinion, which he has to live in. This sort of drivel usually filters out and redflags the nominds so anyone who reads that (...) (22 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
