 | | Re: LEGO-Galidor Perspective In L.A. Times Article —Chris Fenter
| | | | (...) I tell you what would be my worst fear, (apart from the entire company coming to pieces...no pun intended) - that these darned Galidork sets (you should trade mark that one, Tim!), along with Jack Stone, Software and all the other (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.mediawatch)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: LEGO-Galidor Perspective In L.A. Times Article —Richie Dulin
| | | | | (...) When you're tired of the Jack Stone stuff, you pull it apart and build something else from it.... you probably combine some of your system stuff, because there aren't that many pieces in the smaller JS sets. The JS sets contain some good (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.mediawatch)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: LEGO-Galidor Perspective In L.A. Times Article —Peter Root
| | | | | (...) first of all, i didnt write what you quote me saying, i believe that was cris, but i agree with him. (...) you cant, it sucks. which is why i dont buy that crap. (...) our point exactly! (...) and there you have it, "SOME". (...) yes it is, (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.mediawatch)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: LEGO-Galidor Perspective In L.A. Times Article —Richie Dulin
| | | | | (...) No, I think you'll find I quoted Cris, and said so, but I neglected to deleted the part of Cris's posting with your name on it (possibly in the same way that you accidentally deleted the bit at the beginning of my post which said "In (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.mediawatch)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: LEGO-Galidor Perspective In L.A. Times Article —Peter Root
| | | | | i can see where your coming from, its just that they seem to be competing with their own product, you know the figures of jackstone. and dont worry about that misquote thing, i havent been doing this forum thing for very long and i can see i read it (...) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
