Subject:
|
Re: Target Concerns?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.theory
|
Date:
|
Thu, 20 Jan 2000 21:05:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
491 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.market.theory, Dave Schuler writes:
> With all this talk of Target's massive Lego clearance (about which my only
> complaint is that I wasn't able to take better advantage of it), I'm concerned
> that Target might not stock Lego as heavily in the future, considering they
> seem to have sold a lot of it at a loss.
My only concern is that we just got our first target in North Eastern
Massachusetts last summer and I have not seen a single thing clearenced yet.
> Is this at all likely? Further, when Lego tracks its sales, does it
> calculate its figures based on sales to retailers, sales to consumers, or
> both? Does it matter?
I am sure that LEGO does not sell on consignment so I am sure they track their
sales based on what it sells to retailers (Except for the direct to consumer
stuff like S@H and eventually LEGO Direct).
Eric Kingsley
The New England LEGO Users Group
http://www.nelug.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Target Concerns?
|
| (...) This is right only as far as the stock you see--since you haven't seen what *has* been moving, nor the fact that it's moved, I would hazard to guess that your perception of the percentage of items they were eventually forced to clearance is (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jan-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Target Concerns?
|
| With all this talk of Target's massive Lego clearance (about which my only complaint is that I wasn't able to take better advantage of it), I'm concerned that Target might not stock Lego as heavily in the future, considering they seem to have sold a (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jan-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
