 | | "Bundling" sets for auctions doesn't work well. —Adam Yulish
|
| | | (...) I've been told (and I've found it to be true in my own auctions) that "bundling" things together for auction usually does not increase the bid value very much, and sometimes even makes it go down (people only want one set, and figure someone (...) (26 years ago, 24-May-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: "Bundling" sets for auctions doesn't work well. —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) It may depend on the general price range the items are falling into. Generally, the more bundled something is, the greater the number of people who will be attracted to something inside the bundle. But above a certain point, it becomes (...) (26 years ago, 24-May-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: "Bundling" sets for auctions doesn't work well. —Adam Yulish
|
| | | | | | (...) I think that point isn't difficult to reach; rarely does someone want everything in a bundle (which is often why it has been bundled in the first place). <snipped point about the detriments of bundling> (...) Which is why many won't mess with (...) (26 years ago, 26-May-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: "Bundling" sets for auctions doesn't work well. —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) Well, I've rarely seen the 1967 broken up, but I have seen people break up copies of the Launch Command triple pack before. I just figured since I had one left that was unopened I would auction them that way in case someone else wanted them (...) (26 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
