| | Re: Interesting interpretation of "new in box" Scott Arthur
| | | In both cases I think ignorance is the problem, rather than deceitfulness. (25 years ago, 21-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
| | | | | | | | Re: Interesting interpretation of "new in box" Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | I haven't corresponded with the second seller but the first one, based on his note, really did believe he had the box, turned his place upside down for it, and failed to find it, finding only the destroyed remains. See his listing, which has been (...) (25 years ago, 21-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
| | | | | | |