 | | Re: trading —Kerry Raymond
|
| | | (...) and (...) even (...) Personally I never understand why anyone bothers with trading. The whole point of inventing the concept of money was because one-on-one bartering (trading) isn't scaleable because it depends on finding the person who not (...) (19 years ago, 11-Jan-05, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: trading —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) That's all well and good, but if you *do* find someone that has what you want and wants what you have, trading can be both a positive experience *and* an efficient way to do the deal. And sites that seem to be biased towards cash transactions (...) (19 years ago, 11-Jan-05, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: trading —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | Some thoughts: While using cash is a pretty efficient way of doing things, it does have a cost. Surre, the cost is often pretty minimal, but nevertheless there is a cost. Of course a trade has its own costs. TANSTAAFL - There Aint No Such Thing As A (...) (19 years ago, 11-Jan-05, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: trading —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Um, don't you mean "CLOSE to 0"?? If you did a trade with a BrickLink store, you surely did it via buying stuff from that store. (washed by that store buying stuff from yours to even it out or close to it) To do otherwise (to set up a side (...) (19 years ago, 12-Jan-05, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
