Subject:
|
Re: 10152 Update
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.theory
|
Date:
|
Sun, 19 Dec 2004 15:49:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
7544 times
|
| |
|
|
| |
Doesn’t Lego have huge vaults with sets from the past that any of us would
kill to get our hands on - NOW! Why are they saving so many sets? They must
be collectors too!
-Patrick
|
moving thread, probably doesn’t belong in .lego. Market.theory I think should
be better.
Insomuch as magazine and newspaper companies are collectors as well. They also
keep one (or more) copies of their product for future reference. I believe Lego
has done the same thing with their past set vault. I don’t think it exists for
the purpose of collectability, revenue generation, envy generation or museam
funtionality. (though visitors are occaisionally given tours it certainly isn’t
common.)
Mark
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 10152 Update
|
| Hello! (...) TLC keeps their vault for their lawyers. So when, for example, MegaBloks produces a set that's tooo similiar to any LEGO set they walk into their catacombs, take the respective set and show the world: We have done this first! On this (...) (20 years ago, 19-Dec-04, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 10152 Update
|
| In lugnet.lego, Mark Neumann wrote: Snippage (...) Doesn't Lego have huge vaults with sets from the past that any of us would kill to get our hands on - NOW! Why are they saving so many sets? They must be collectors too! -Patrick (20 years ago, 19-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
257 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
