Subject:
|
Re: 10152 Update
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego
|
Date:
|
Sun, 19 Dec 2004 14:25:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
7561 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego, Mark Neumann wrote:
Snippage
| |
Next in this thread, I read that some out there thinks Lego is a collectible.
No, it isn’t. It’s a toy. When I see a world city set on a shelf, I don’t
think, “Dang! I better get that and seal it away because it’ll be worth
somehting in 5 years.” Lego is a toy, what people do with it makes it
collectible. But I feel pretty confident when I say that the Lego company
doesn’t produce sets with collectability in mind. Don’t believe me? Read
the product description of the 10152 on Lego.com. Nothing there about
“limited edition.” Insider info made it collectible.
|
Doesn’t Lego have huge vaults with sets from the past that any of us would kill
to get our hands on - NOW! Why are they saving so many sets? They must be
collectors too!
-Patrick
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 10152 Update
|
| (...) moving thread, probably doesn't belong in .lego. Market.theory I think should be better. Insomuch as magazine and newspaper companies are collectors as well. They also keep one (or more) copies of their product for future reference. I believe (...) (19 years ago, 19-Dec-04, to lugnet.market.theory, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 10152 Update
|
| OMG, just about everything off the first post in this thread is so lame. First, Jake, thank you for the update. I'd been kind of wondering actually. Also, thank you for telling us the story in detail. Where so many other official releases would just (...) (19 years ago, 19-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX) !
|
257 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
