 | | Re: Small annoyance with seller —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Er, you "told" him? Or did you mean you and he communicated about the problem and agreed in advance that was the course of action that was appropriate. Someone who "tells" me how they are going to solve our mutual problem without exploring (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Small annoyance with seller —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | (...) Here is an excerpt of my first email to him: "I found some problems with my order -- mainly that some of the items were in unacceptable condition (i.e. NOT in the "great condition" as stated in your descriptions). To make things easy, I will (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Small annoyance with seller —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Yep, I think you put your finger on it. I think you have a beef (although, as you say in the subject, a "small" one) all right. Communication wasn't did. (...) Oooh, I will have to watch for *that* boilerplate because *mine* says buyer pays (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Small annoyance with seller —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | (...) Keep in mind that the black visor was the only part I wanted, so since it was not in very good shape I wasted my whole effort in buying this figure. I get the idea that finding this one element in near mint-mint condition is going to be no (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
