 | | Re: The meaning of "Complete" —Kyle D. Jackson
|
| | | (...) I agree with Frank's suggestions for Heather's questions. These are the sorts of things that I would put into my listings if I sold unsealed sets. (I only sell MISB sets at present, but will soon be selling unsealed sets as well. Many of these (...) (23 years ago, 22-Apr-01, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The meaning of "Complete" —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) This cuts both ways. While I share your anguish at seeing rare sets get parted, the flip side is this: Is it better to sell a somewhat incomplete set as is, or part it out, recoup your investment and potentially see the parts complete SEVERAL (...) (23 years ago, 22-Apr-01, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The meaning of "Complete" —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | (...) My experience is that if the set isn't MISB (or at least 100% complete), you're far better off parting it out. I always do better--but then again, I rarely get anything more than a few years old to part out. YMMV. LFB (23 years ago, 22-Apr-01, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The meaning of "Complete" —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Oh, I totally agree.... from the perspective of a seller. My bad, I didn't write this clearly enough to show that I was asking the question from the perspective of a BUYER. I think it's a tossup, there. Kyle, I think, feels that from the (...) (23 years ago, 23-Apr-01, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
